Amnesty is better when it’s paired with freedom
Thursday, April 10th, 2008Hussein has been held by the U.S. military since being detained by Marines on April 12, 2006, in Ramadi, about 70 miles west of Baghdad. Throughout his incarceration, he has maintained he is innocent and was only doing the work of a professional news photographer in a war zone. […]
The AP said a review of Hussein’s work and contacts also found no evidence of any activities beyond the normal role of a news photographer. Hussein was a member of an AP team that won a Pulitzer Prize for photography in 2005, and his detention has drawn protests from rights groups and press freedom advocates such as the Committee to Protect Journalists.
”The Amnesty Committee took only a few days to determine what we have been saying for two years. Bilal Hussein must be freed immediately,” said Curley, the AP’s president.
”The U.S. military has said the Iraqi process should be allowed to work. It has, and the military must finally do the right thing by ending its detention of a journalist who did nothing more than his job. Bilal’s imprisonment stands as a sad black mark on American values of justice and fairness,” Curley added.
It’s a great thing when a wrongly imprisoned man is set free. Of course he hasn’t been freed yet, he’s just been granted amnesty. The US is still holding him. But it’s a great thing he’s been exonerated. The question this raises, of course, is what has become of America that a prisoner we hold for 2 years can be rightly cleared of wrong-doing in a fraction the time from the courts of a barely functioning government.



