Archive for July, 2008

How does a ghost town exist in a world so desperately in need of new laser tag courses?

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

Oddee.com has put together a list of the 10 most amazing ghost towns. Amazing is certainly the right word; the abandoned dwellings cover all sorts of terrain and socio-economic areas and the page is certainly worth a glance. There’s nothing going on quite like The World Without Us describes, though there are apparently a few trees growing in buildings.

If you can find a newspaper that covered this, get some scissors and have your own ticker tape parade

Monday, July 21st, 2008

From the LA Times:

In an interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, Maliki embraced Obama’s plan, saying: “That, we think, would be the right time frame for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.” Maliki said he was not making an endorsement in the presidential race.

The endorsement of the Iraqi Prime Minister for a plan that calls for combat withdrawal - an effective end to the Iraq War - is enormous news. Ironically only the LA Times fronted the story, owing to pressure exerted from the White House for the Iraqi government to issue a retractment, which they (vaguely) did. When the New York Times ran the story they ran it as a story focused on the implications for al-Maliki given the disapproval his comments generated with senior White House and US military leaders. Even so, this offers the most real possibility of an actual conclusion to the Iraq War we’ve had since it began. The lead of Iraq, Prime Minister Maliki, effectively supports presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama’s 16-month time-table for withdrawal, and presumptive Republican nominee John McCain has repeatedly stated that he would respect Iraq’s sovereignty on the issue of withdrawal (though his plan calls for no immediate withdrawal and indefinite military presence). It’s unlikely that McCain would actually advocate such a speedy withdrawal since it would be near political suicide, but this is the clearest hope the American public has had yet for an actual termination to the War. A full rundown with the official responses of the candidates is here.

Related: While the mainstream press was slow to run this story, The White House press corps inadvertantly emailed this story to their entire list (instead of the intended internal list) immediately after Der Speigel, the source of the Maliki interview, ran the story on the wire.

Why not rename it gooogle while you’re at it

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

newgooglezoom.jpgGoogle’s strength has always laid in their user experience: Fast load times and a dead-simple interface made for an irresistible search engine. But the need for growth has pushed them to compromise the very qualities that make them attractive in the first place. My search results now include rating and commenting components, two features that sound like they may be good additions. But instead, these new features are bad for 3 reasons.

  1. The non-text elements on my screen just increased tenfold. Previously the Google logo, a search bar and possibly a Google checkout graphic were the only graphic intrusions that cost me load time (and cost Google serve time) or added elements to the visual presentation. The ranking and commenting added 30 graphic elements. Even worse, these new elements introduce colors and behaviors new to Google search. They all have the appearance of translucence, a design tactic not used previously on their search result. They also have non-uniform behaviours: Rolling over the up-arrow generates a green rollover, while the ‘x’ and comments bubble just get a darker grey.Green means good?
  2. By introducing an explicit ranking system, Google is introduced overt influence into their ranking system. Part of the strength of most search engines is the ease of use - anyone can enter a phrase and get back a relevant result. There is no require for a survey about your previous experience with similar searches. There is no financial cost for results. There is just a question and an answer. But now, Google is fostering a sense that you need to rank their responses to get better results. Perhaps they are right and that will lead to better search results (which is not a given) - where is a user’s incentive to substantially increase their investment for marginally better searches? Who is willing to go from a one-click search to a search improved 1% at the cost of 10 clicks? The answer, of course, is web surfers that have already migrated to other niche-search engines.
  3. The lack of focus on the comments will provide nothing but noise, further degrading the value of the information on the page. What are the comments for? Am I supposed to comment on the quality of the specific results as they relate to my search? I could just as easily comment on the quality of the result in an objective setting, which has little value in the context of the search results. If I run a search for “funniest Obama joke” (which you’re not allowed to make, remember) I get a mix of videos, new stories and web page in my results. I could also, with these new features, get comments ranging from “This video is hilarious” (content-specific), “This site is so racist” (site-specific), or “A story about a cancelled debate doesn’t help me find a funny joke” (search result-specific). Given the range of likely results, the comments are almost certain to become noise.

Google has gained little with this adjustment, and given the feature release appears to be limited to select users right now, it’s unlikely the add-ons will make it to Google proper unadjusted.

I miss the writers strike when late night hosts at least had an excuse not to be funny

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

From the NY Times:

Comedy has been no easier for the phalanx of late-night television hosts who depend on skewering political leaders for a healthy quotient of their nightly monologues. Jay Leno, David Letterman, Conan O’Brien and others have delivered a nightly stream of jokes about the Republican running for president — each one a variant on the same theme: John McCain is old.But there has been little humor about Mr. Obama: about his age, his speaking ability, his intelligence, his family, his physique. And within a late-night landscape dominated by white hosts, white writers, and overwhelmingly white audiences, there has been almost none about his race….Despite audience resistance, Mr. Stewart contended, his show had been able to develop a distinctive angle on Mr. Obama.Noting that the senator seems to emphasize the historic nature of his quest, Mr. Stewart said, “So far, our take is that he’s positioning himself to be on a coin.”…Jimmy Kimmel, the host of the ABC late-night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” said of Mr. Obama, “There’s a weird reverse racism going on. You can’t joke about him because he’s half-white. It’s silly. I think it’s more a problem because he’s so polished, he doesn’t seem to have any flaws.”

Perhaps there’s a actual reticence comedians have to make fun of Obama. But McCain may just be an easier target. McCain revels in giving the press the sort of personal access that invariably exposes him to the risk of poorly-phrased quotes getting caught on camera. He offers that access because it results in more favorable press coverage, but the collateral cost may be ready-made comic materials. Obama, on the other hand, has run a very disciplined campaign that offers little casual press access. Less access results in less unscripted conversation, and less room for error.Again, it’s very possible that some jokes about Obama get discarded because of racial sensitivity or political ideology. But McCain’s offered a steady stream of pre-packaged jokes this campaign season and you can’t blame comedians from running with jokes that are practically prewritten.

“Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter”

Friday, July 11th, 2008

From the Independent:

President George Bush signed off with a defiant farewell over his refusal to accept global climate change targets at his last G8 summit.

As he prepared to fly out from Japan, he told his fellow leaders: “Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter.”

President Bush made the private joke in the summit’s closing session, senior sources said yesterday. His remarks were taken as a two-fingered salute from the President from Texas who is wedded to the oil industry. He had given some ground at the summit by saying he would “seriously consider” a 50 per cent cut in carbon emissions by 2050.

I wish I was the kind of person that could create something like this, but for now I’m content just to be the kind of person that can appreciate it.

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Upsize your value meal for only $100 billion

Monday, July 7th, 2008

From CalorieLab:

For 2008 Mississippi has claimed the title of fattest state for the third consecutive year, while Colorado repeats as the leanest. Delaware rose the most places in the rankings over last year, while California dropped the most, according to a new analysis by CalorieLab, Inc.

The only state to get slimmer this year is not actually a state: the District of Columbia’s three-year obesity rate dropped by 0.1 percent.

While Colorado deserves some accolades for having the fewest obese residents, still nearly 1 out of every 5 Colorado residents is obese. In fact, if you look at the percentage of residents obese or just overweight (as determined by BMI), every state including Colorado is more than 50% overweight or obese.
As alarming as that may seem, the rate of fattening is terrifying. In 1995, the first year the CDC lists national BMI stats, national statistics reveal 10% fewer obese people, and 10% more people neither overweight nor obese than 2008. In 1998, the CDC estimated the national cost of obesity was between $50b and $75b. That same year, there were 8% fewer obese people in America than today. So what’s the cost today? According to obesityinamerica.org the cost of obesity today is $122b annually. The CDC pegs half the total obesity costs as medical expenditures paid by Medicare and Medicaid. If that holds, then this year every man, woman and child is spending $200 on obesity.

Apparently white people don’t break the law

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

From the NY Times:

The Justice Department is considering letting the FBI investigate Americans without any evidence of wrongdoing, relying instead on a terrorist profile that could single out Muslims, Arabs or other racial and ethnic groups.

What in the world is the Justice Department thinking? They ignored warning Bin Laden would attack the US with planes in April, 2001 then classify the congressional testimony related. They don’t investigate present cases filed against the government for fraud or criminal activity because of a backlog. They politicize the hirings of US attorneys, falsely prosecuting prominent democratic politicians to tilt elections toward Republicans.
In short they can’t legally fulfill their job as is, but plan to restore their reputation by racial profiling? Brilliant.

By limiting my reading to dust jackets and book covers, I never risk losing my page

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

From Acme Archives Direct:
Wall•E

Can you judge a book by its cover? Well, how about a movie? It seems that every few years a trend develops where great posters strongly correlate to great film, but without fail a movie like Smokin Aces comes along with excellent visual design and proves to be terrible. Take a run down /film’s list of the best posters of 2007 and excepting Smokin Aces which was terrible and horror films which are always, well, horror-ble. The only poster missing is the brilliant work for Funny Games, perhaps 2007’s best movie poster.
Will this hold for 2008? Check Internet Movie Poster Awards’ list of 2008 posters and judge for yourself. But based on this rational, I’ll be first in line to see Choke and City of Ember when they hit theaters.